FY27–FY31 Long-Range Capacity PlanningCycle open · Leadership review 12 Sep 2026
Active scenarioFY27–FY31 Balanced BaselineDraft

Scenario Studio

Change any assumption, record why, and rerun the deterministic planning model. Every lever recomputes the whole chain from demand translation to gap classification.

Demand: Demand v12Capacity: Capacity v8Rules v4Last run 05 Aug 2026, 09:14

Demand levers

Which demand picture is the plan protecting against?

Demand blend

Capacity levers

Future line, assumptions and downtime

Future line — start of production

EU Line 03 (Future) · Third line at site

Future line — location

Europe

Changes sourcing split, blended lead time and ramp profile.

Performance rate

77%

Staffing pattern

3 crews

Lead-time adjustment

0 wks

Finished-goods cover

6 wks

Additional planned downtime

Reason for change (recorded in the audit trail)

Live result

Current model output

Sustained capacity gaps0
Earliest constraintNone
Families at risk0
Network coverage99.7%
Peak line utilization55.5%
Total unmet requirement5.6 MSU

Change log

This scenario only

No assumption changes recorded yet.

Question this scenario answers

Is earlier commissioning worth the commissioning premium?

Deterministic engine: the same inputs and rules always produce the same plan, so results can be reviewed and defended.