FY27–FY31 Long-Range Capacity PlanningCycle open · Leadership review 12 Sep 2026
Active scenarioFY27–FY31 Balanced BaselineDraft

Compare Scenarios

Two plans, the same rules, the same governed inputs. The comparison shows what changed, what it costs and what it protects.

2 scenarios in the cycleDeterministic rerun — results are reproducible

Plan A

Official baseline: 50/50 balanced demand with the future European line starting in January FY29.

Sustained capacity gaps0
Earliest constraintNone
Families at risk0
Coverage99.7%
Peak line utilization55.5%
Unmet requirement5.6 MSU

Plan B

Commissioning delay test: the future European line slips from January FY29 to March FY29.

Sustained capacity gaps0
Earliest constraintNone
Families at risk0
Coverage99.7%
Peak line utilization55.5%
Unmet requirement5.6 MSU

Capacity against requirement

Half-year view — FY27–FY31 Balanced Baseline vs EU Line — March SOP

What is different

Only the assumptions that diverge matter

AssumptionPlan APlan B
Demand blend50/50 Balanced50/50 Balanced
Future line SOPFY29 01FY29 03
Future line locationEuropeEurope
Performance rateLine defaultLine default
Staffing patternLine defaultLine default
Finished-goods coverPolicy defaultPolicy default
Additional downtimeNoneNone
Demand versiondv12dv12
Capacity versioncv8cv8

Decision scorecard

Compared on the criteria leadership actually uses

CriterionPlan APlan B
Coverage99.7%99.7%
Timing of reliefFuture line relief from FY29 JanFuture line relief from FY29 Mar
Utilization band38% average · 56% peak38% average · 56% peak
Capital weightOne new premium line — Europe (third line at site)One new premium line — Europe (third line at site)
Downside regretModerate — capacity added ahead of balanced demand onlyModerate — capacity added ahead of balanced demand only
RobustnessHolds across the balanced picture; retest against 20/80 high sideHolds across the balanced picture; retest against 20/80 high side
ExplainabilityFull lineage available for every cellFull lineage available for every cell

How to read this

A later start of production usually looks cheaper today and creates a structural gap later. The scorecard makes that trade-off explicit instead of leaving it in a spreadsheet footnote.